At ATA 2015 (American Telemedicine Association), held in Los Angeles, a milestone was achieved as over 5,000 attendees from around the world stormed the LA Convention Center. The content of the symposium keeps getting better, ranging from lightening rounds to superb plenary sessions. What particularly struck me was that the keynote speakers, both physicians in different areas of medicine both understood and support telemedicine as an integral part of healthcare delivery. Dr. Sanjay Gupta, chief CNN medical correspondent, had previously done a story on telemedicine featuring Yulun Wang, CEO of InTouch Health. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, an entrepreneur and brilliant visionary, has already embarked upon ways to treat cancer utilizing mobile health. The exhibit hall allowed one to roam a roomy exhibit hall to see new and established medical product and software companies display and explain their technology. Based upon the opinion of those in attendance, the ATA is striving toward increasing the content experience. Looking optimistically to another high level meeting in Minnesota for ATA 2016.
by HIT Consultant Staff 07/15/2015
Approximately 75 percent of patients reported they either would not trust a diagnosis made via telemedicine, or would trust this method less than an in-doctor visit, according to a recent nationwide study conducted by TechnologyAdvice Research. The report reveals that although telemedicine initiatives may have a promising future to increase reliable access to basic and preventative care, patients remain dubious about this remote option and the quality of diagnosis made during virtual appointments. Nearly 65 percent of respondents said they would be somewhat or very unlikely to choose a virtual appointment known as a telehealth visit, while only 35.4 percent stated the opposite.
Telemedicine is a newer technology in the medical industry, with greater lack of familiarity, but data from the study shows that younger patients may be less skeptical. Only about 17 percent of 18-24 year old respondents, and 24 percent of 25-44 year olds, said they wouldn’t trust a virtual diagnosis. Also, 65 percent of respondents said they would be somewhat or much more likely to use a virtual appointment system if they had first seen the doctor in-person.
“If patients don’t trust the diagnoses made during telemedicine calls, they may ignore the advice given, fail to take preventative steps, or seek additional in-person appointments, which defeats the point of telemedicine,” said Cameron Graham, Managing Editor at TechnologyAdvice and the study’s author.
Increasing Telehealth Adoption
To increase acceptance of telemedicine and use of such services, healthcare providers and vendors need to focus on effectively explaining the advantages of these platforms. A combined 70 percent of respondents reported at least one of the following factors would make them more likely to use a virtual appointment: more convenient scheduling options, lower cost, less time spent in the waiting room, and ability to conduct virtual appointments at home.
The original data contained in the report comes from a nationwide internet survey of 504 U.S. adults (age 18 and over). The survey participants were surveyed about their preferences and feelings regarding telemedicine services. It is important to note the small size of the survey participants when reviewing this report and others.
Comment: The key portion of this story is the last paragraph. That tells all as it is a very small sample size. This statistically shallow survey is making headlines and certainly for those who deal with hospital patients would never suspect this as an issue.
Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Hospital has chosen C3O Telemedicine to provide acute teleneurology coverage. Dr. Herb Rogove, CEO of C3O, says “we are extremely delighted to have been chosen as MLK Jr. Community Hospitals telemedicine service provider”. MLK has built their hospital with the 21st century in mind as they are a true telemedicine facility according to Rogove.
The key strengths of C3O are:
- Rapid response times
- A virtual who’s who of teleneurologists from leading medical centers
- Proven achievement of quality metrics and excellent outcomes
Located in the Second District of the Los Angeles County, the brand new Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Hospital (MLKCH) is a priority project for local authorities. It is expected to serve 1.2 million residents from all over South Los Angeles and to create more than 900 jobs in the area.
MobileSmith is the provider for mobile apps.
“Our strategy is to get into mobile extremely quickly, without overly burdening our IT staff or infrastructure,” said Sajid Ahmed, Chief Information and Innovation Officer at MLKCH. “With its powerful capabilities and easy learning curve, the MobileSmith Platform is the ideal solution for us. We are looking forward to launching many great apps.”
Yaghi S1, Harik SI2, Hinduja A2, Bianchi N2, Johnson DM2, Keyrouz SG2.
- 1Department of Neurology and the AR Saves Program of the Center for Distant Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR email@example.com.
- 2Department of Neurology and the AR Saves Program of the Center for Distant Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
The purpose of our study is to determine whether the transfer of patients to hub hospitals is beneficial.
- Retrospectively analyzed data from our prospectively collected cohort in the AR SAVES (Stroke Assistance through Virtual Emergency Support) telestroke network from November 2008 till January 2012.
- We compared the outcome of patients who were transferred to a “hub” with those who remained at the “spoke” hospital where thrombolysis took place.
- We stratified patients according to stroke severity using admission NIHSS scores into two groups: patients with mild stroke (NIHSS <8) and those with moderate to severe stroke (NIHSS ≥8). We defined good outcome as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed, and significance was considered at p < 0.05.
- Out of 894 telestroke consultations, 206 patients received thrombolytic therapy; 134 patients had moderate to severe strokes and 160 patients (78%) were transferred to the hub after thrombolytic therapy.
- The percentage of patients with good outcome at 3 months was similar between patients transferred to hub and those who stayed at the spoke (61% vs. 55%, p = NS).
- However, when only patients with moderate to severe strokes were analyzed, patients transferred to the hub were more likely to have good outcomes at three months post t-PA (50% versus 24%, p = 0.026).
Patients with moderate to severe ischemic strokes who were treated with t-PA in a telestroke network may potentially benefit from expert care at a primary stroke center.
Many tele-stroke programs are based upon the hub-spoke model. Often in rural hospitals without ICU’s the obvious course is to start tPA then transfer to a hub center. The question then comes up, for these less severe patients, do we still need to transfer them after tPA is given. In depth data on complications in this cohort needs to be reviewed. Outcomes as far as survival look very good.
(PRWEB) May 14, 2015 — WASHINGTON- Thursday, May 14, 2015— The American Telemedicine Association (ATA) recently elected Reed V. Tuckson, MD, as President of the Association’s Board of Directors. Dr, Tuckson has been recognized among the 50 most influential physician executives and top 25 minority executives in healthcare. With a distinguished career that has spanned over 35 years, Tuckson has served in a variety of senior posts including the Senior Vice President for Professional Standards of the American Medical Association and the Executive Vice President and Chief of Medical Affairs for UnitedHealth Group. He is currently the Managing Director of Tuckson Health Connections.
Tuckson is joined by the following members of the Board’s executive committee: – President-Elect, LTG (Ret.) James Peake, MD, Senior Vice President, CGI Federal, former U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Surgeon General of the United States Army – Vice President, Peter Yellowlees, MD, MBBS, Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UC Davis Health System – Secretary and Treasurer, Herb Rogove, DO, FCCM, FACP, President & CEO, C3O Telemedicine – Immediate Past President, Yulun Wang, PhD, Chairman & CEO, InTouch Health In addition, two other individuals recently joined the Board of Directors: – Amnon Gavish, ScD, Senior Vice President of Vertical Solutions, Vidyo, Inc.; Chair of ATA’s Industry Council – Kristi Henderson, DNP, NP-BC, FAEN, Chief Telehealth and Innovation Officer, the University of Mississippi Medical Center; Past Chair of ATA’s Institutional Council “We are pleased to announce the addition of this group of prestigious individuals to the Board and officers of this Association,” said Jonathan Linkous, CEO of ATA. “This reflects ATA intention to work with a balance of leaders from both the ranks of healthcare providers and industry in order to fulfil our goal to improve healthcare delivery through the use of telecommunications technology.” Other current at-large Board members include Ellen R. Cohn, PhD; Naomi Fried, PhD; Alexis Gilroy, JD; John Glaser, PhD; Julia L. Johnson, JD; Roy Schoenberg, MD; and Andrew R. Watson, MD.
About the American Telemedicine Association The American Telemedicine Association is the leading international resource and advocate promoting the use of advanced remote medical technologies. ATA and its diverse membership work to fully integrate telemedicine into healthcare systems to improve quality, equity and affordability of healthcare throughout the world. Established in 1993, ATA is headquartered in Washington, DC. For more information, visit www.americantelemed.org
As telehealth becomes an integral component of our health care delivery system and patients become mroe accustomed to its convenience, hospitals, health systems and other providers will seek new ways to use the rapidly evolving technology in diverse and innovative ways. This TrendWatch focuses on the legal and regulatory challenges that may arise when using telehealth technologies. Legal and regulatory challenges abound in the following areas:
- Coverage and Payment;
- Health Professional Licensure;
- Credentialing and Privileging;
- Online Prescribing;
- Medical Malpractice and Professional Liability Insurance;
- Privacy and Security; and
- Fraud and Abuse.
After attending the ATA 2015 meeting in Los Angeles last week, one might be interested in the research being done in mental health utilizing mobile devices for young patients. It appears that in the journal, Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, just published last fall, a review article appeared to address this issue. Only seventeen articles to date have been published and were discussed.
Four gaps in current knowledge were identified: the scarcity of studies conducted in low and middle income countries, the absence of information about the real-life feasibility of mobile tools, the need to address the issue of technical and health literacy of both young users and health professionals, and the need for critical discussion regarding diverse ethical issues associated with mobile phone use. The authors suggested that mHealth researchers and clinicians looking at mental health carefully consider the ethical issues related to patient-practitioner relationship, best practices, and the logic of self-surveillance.
Section 106(c): Telehealth
Medicare currently reimburses physicians for certain services provided at certain sites through live video conferencing for eligible Medicare beneficiaries. 42 U.S.C. § 1395m(m). MACRA requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to draft two reports to be submitted to Congress within two years of MACRA’s enactment; the first report will pertain to the Medicare telehealth program, and the second will focus on remote patient monitoring technology and services. The first report on the Medicare telehealth program will evaluate circumstances that help or inhibit the use of telehealth under Medicare and the possible effects of an expansion of telehealth on payment and delivery systems under Medicare and Medicaid. The second report will examine incentives for adopting patient monitoring technology and services by private health insurance, as well as barriers for adopting this technology by Medicare. This report will also look at which patients and circumstances may receive the greatest benefit from this technology. Many health care practitioners believe that the time for government studies of telehealth has long passed and legislative action is needed now to expand beneficiary access, particularly in rural areas.